You're not confused — a situationship is designed to confuse you

Why the 'almost relationship' has become the most emotionally expensive arrangement in modern dating, and how to find your way out.

A situationship is a romantic entanglement with the emotional weight of a relationship and none of its agreements. It is, by design, impossible to hold — which is exactly what keeps you holding it.

There's a specific kind of exhaustion that comes with a situationship. It's not the grief of a clean breakup. It's not the warmth of a relationship. It's the fog of not knowing — and the quiet suspicion that asking out loud might shatter the whole thing.

Let's name what a situationship actually is: a romantic entanglement that has the emotional weight of a relationship but none of its agreements. You might sleep together, text constantly, meet each other's friends. But the moment you reach for clarity — "what are we?" — you're somehow the one who's being difficult.

Why are situationships so emotionally expensive?

Situationships are psychologically sticky because they run on intermittent reinforcement — the same principle that makes slot machines addictive. The good moments are real. The care is real. The problem is the uncertainty around when those moments will come, and whether they mean what you hope they mean.

When something good is inconsistent, your brain learns to chase it harder. You become invested not despite the ambiguity but because of it. The good moments feel earned. The gap between them is filled with decoding, with hope, with the mental labour of figuring out where you stand. By the time you realise how much energy you've spent, you're already in deep.

How do I bring up the "what are we" conversation?

You don't need a strategy. You need to stop treating clarity as an aggressive act. The "what are we" conversation has been made to feel like a trap when it's actually the most basic thing two people can discuss. You're not asking for a marriage proposal. You're asking whether you're on the same page about what you're doing together.

Pick a calm moment — not after a conflict, not at 2am in bed. Say: "I like what we have and I'd find it easier to know what we're calling it." That's it. The response you get — not just the words, but the ease or discomfort of having it — is information.

If the conversation is met with deflection, accusation, or a sudden need to "not label things," that too is information. Possibly more useful than a direct answer.

"If it costs you your peace, it's too expensive — no matter how good the good parts feel."

What if they say they're "not ready"?

Sometimes true. But "not ready for a relationship" more often means "not ready for one with you specifically." When the same person is in a committed relationship six months later, you'll understand what "not ready" actually meant.

This doesn't mean they're a bad person. It means they communicated using the language of timing when the honest language was preference. That's human. But it means your job now is to hear what was actually said, not the version that's easier to wait out.

How do I find my way out of one?

First: decide what you actually want, and be honest with yourself. Some people stay in situationships because they genuinely don't want more — not because they're afraid to ask, but because the arrangement suits them. That's fine. But most people who write to me about their situationship already know they want more and are hoping to be told how to want less. I can't help you want less.

If you want more than you're getting, you have two real options: ask for it clearly and see what happens, or leave. The middle path — hoping the situation changes, staying because of the good moments, waiting for them to come around — is not a path. It's a waiting room.

Getting out means accepting a period of grief for something that was never officially yours. That grief is real. It counts. Let it count.

— Chechi

Something this touched on?

Tell Chechi your version — anonymously. She reads every one.

Tell Chechi Everything